Yoga Will Not Save Your Life

Yoga will not pull you out of sadness or give you a greater appreciation for the beauty of the world. Yoga will not make you healthier. Yoga will not make you stronger or more balanced. Yoga will not improve your breathing, center your mind, or bring you peace. Yoga will not connect you with positive, kind, compassionate people. I promise you this. And when someone says to you, “yoga will save your life” just know that they are very, very wrong. 

Read More

Teachers of 26 & 2! Change your students' lives with this one simple tip!

How's that for a clickbait title, right? 

Fine. It's fine. No worries. Turns out I mean it. 

This Tuesday night a student named Mary approached me to tell me that she has a history of suffering migraines after taking the 26 & 2 class. They were so bad, she said, that she often dreaded coming to practice. But she loved the yoga and kept returning, despite a near constant concern that the next day she might have to deal with an intense headache as a result. This was obviously upsetting to her, but she smiled when she told me, "I've taken your class three times now, and the headaches are gone."

Just the night before a student named Frank came up to me after class to tell me that his practice had become so much more steady and manageable since taking my class. He could breathe more and focus better in the hot room, which improved his whole experience of the practice.

I get this feedback all the time. I heard similar responses twice just last night.

I would love to tell you these students were responding to something unique and special, some hidden secret that only I knew and only I could communicate. But that's simply not the case. The truth is the most basic command I use has turned out to be the most transformative.

So here it is. If you want to reach students immediately, speak to their felt experience in the room, and empower them overnight, just tell them this one thing:

Relax your neck.

That terrible sound in the background is my dog annihilating a rubber toy. You're welcome.

Relax your neck. That's it. You wouldn't think such a basic command could immediately change students' practices, but for me the proof is in the pudding. Over and over people come to me to say thank you for telling them to simply stop clenching the neck. 

If you look around a hot room at any time, you'll see why this is an important reminder for our students. In nearly every pose, except perhaps the front side compressions, someone in the room will be clenching the neck tightly. Honestly, in my experience, those who do not automatically clench and bind the back of the neck are the exception, not the rule.

See, neck tension is a component of struggle. When we're trying really hard (or trying to convince ourselves that we're trying really hard. I'm looking at you, USA Culture of Stress) we clench the back of the neck in a bracing position. You can watch this response in your own body, just think of something really scary or difficult and your neck will immediately freeze up. Usually, the back of the skull gets pulled down and the shoulders come up in a kind of "frightened turtle" position.

26 & 2 is challenging. It puts us up against our limits on some days. The heat can be a source of stress, and the series calls for strong muscular action from the very first motion. So what do we do, if it's our very first class ever? We get nervous and we clench the neck. And no one ever corrects it, and over time it becomes part of the practice. We make the clench in the neck a deeply ingrained habit, and unless we're told to let go of it, we don't. 

This turns into a real problem for even the most experienced students, because neck tension is connected to low back tension. And because our practice becomes an act of struggle instead of an act of freedom. We develop the habit of "I just have to get through this," instead of "I wonder what strangely amazing thing my body can do today?" We also restrict the breath, power up the fight or flight response, and exhaust ourselves when we bind the neck. 

Look to your students. Watch their bodies. You will see it, and once you've seen it you'll discover it's everywhere. Put someone in Awkward and watch their chin lift and their neck crunch in the back. Same in Eagle. SSHTK. Standing Bow, Balancing Stick, SLS, Triangle... it goes on and on and on.

Unfortunately, there isn't much in traditional dialogue that discusses neck tension. But that doesn't mean you can't help your students. Just tell them to relax the neck, then step back and watch. Watch their whole bodies rearrange as they begin to breathe more freely. Watch them become less nervous. Watch as migraines stop, anxiety diminishes, core strength begins to develop, and the practice gains a new power to help your students move forward towards balanced, healthy lives.

Other ways of saying it: Unlock your neck, release neck tension, get your shoulders out of your ears, don't pinch your skull into the back of your neck, keep your neck long and relaxed, clear your neck tension, relax the jaw, don't crunch your neck, check to see if your neck is binding. (Side note: A student from the Southern states recently told me it's not the best idea to say, "check your neck" in class if you're ever teaching below the Mason-Dixon. I didn't ask.


Upcoming Workshops

A Case for a Higher Cause: Part 1 - Getting it Right/Wrong

"...provability is a weaker notion than truth."Douglas R. Hofstadter

"...provability is a weaker notion than truth."

Douglas R. Hofstadter

In his famous talk “This Is Water” the late, great David Foster Wallace spoke of what he called the ‘default setting’ for our minds. He argued our default setting is chronic obsession with ourselves and our own petty struggles with life. I agree with this assessment, but I think we need to take it further. Our default setting includes much more than simple selfishness.

I think the default setting for most of us involves seeking flaws in the world, and in ourselves. We search for imperfection. We label things up and down, good or bad, on and on and on. And this is not necessarily bad itself. It’s part of being human. But we must investigate how and why we do it, largely because we live in a world of messaging. We are constantly being told what to think, what is right, who to listen to, etc… If we’re not careful, we will end up with a system of right/wrong judgment that does not serve us. Our morality can easily become a product of culture, not consideration. What’s more, our own sense of morality can start to work against our well being.

WHAT'S A HIGHER PURPOSE?

I should be clear that “higher purpose” doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with religion or God or spirituality. It just means something that you consciously choose to serve as the foundation for your belief system.  It could be a religious code, a purpose, a method, a faith, a community, a motto, etc… And it doesn’t necessarily have to be permanent, either. It can change and evolve with you as you grow. The key point is that you choose it, actively, after sincere consideration and reflection.

Your higher purpose has the final say in your ethical and moral decisions. It doesn’t have caveats.* You might violate it at times, we all make mistakes, but there are no loopholes. In the personal conversation of whether your behavior is ethical, the buck stops with your higher purpose.

A simple example of a higher purpose might be compassion (or, to clarify with some clunky language, “my higher purpose is to actualize true compassion.”) In the framework of a higher purpose, compassion is not something that's good in specific circumstances. It is good and right and true in all circumstances. It is the final answer, Regis.

Let’s imagine you’re walking through a city and you see a homeless person on the street asking for change. You have an internal deliberation about whether or not to give that person money. If your higher purpose is compassion, then your internal dialogue is framed in terms of “is it compassionate to give this homeless person change?” You might answer yes, you might answer no (I would personally argue the intellectual gymnastics required for a “no” answer in this situation are so complex as to be self-defeating, but that’s a different topic altogether…) the real point is whether you’re using compassion as the standard for your actions. If you choose the higher purpose of “justice” or “social darwinism” or “counting frowns” you might have a different response.

A CULTURE OF RIGHTNESS

So what does all this have to do with the felt emotional life of a human being in the 21st century? Well, a gajillion things, but one of the more pressing ones, I find, has to do with our desire to be right. Because this is a real condition in our society; we all want to be right. In good old Modern USA, our cultural higher purpose is not “I want status” or “make lots of money”, it’s “I will be right at all times.” Money and status are just tools we use to prove rightness. Those who have money and status claim they are right because they have it. Those who do not have money and status claim they are right because they don’t have it. What’s at stake is not really money and status, it’s whether or not we’re right.

And this gets very dangerous very fast, because we start wading into the waters of “right according to whom?” So we look around for authorities to validate our rightness, we insulate ourselves in bubbles of rightness with other like-minded people, and we vilify those who challenge our rightness. We build massive, complex intellectual frameworks to protect our rightness. We build entire industries dedicated to our desire to be right.** Indeed, there is nothing more fashionable to us today than a right opinion.

FACEBOOK RIGHTNESS

There are stages in the struggle to be right. The first stage is what I call “Facebook Rightness.” It isn’t exclusive to Facebook of course, and Facebook didn't invent it, it’s just totally apparent there. When we are lost in our desire to be right, at the basest level, we simply bludgeon those who disagree. We try to overwhelm our adversaries with information, or shame them, or insult their intelligence or maybe even their very humanity. Our desire to be right manifests as righteousness - as if all questions of merit had been answered already - and we make the opposing view inherently wrong, full stop. 

There is no discussion in Facebook Rightness, because there is no real desire to solve the problem. The problem is not something to be solved at all, it is simply the playing field on which we stage our game of “who is right?” We take the game very seriously, while pretending to take the problem seriously.

To use an example from national politics, liberal progressives (a group I count myself a part of) didn’t solve racism by electing a black president, we just shamed the people who voted against him. We will not solve the problem of divisive anger by voting against Trump, either. From all appearances, we will simply continue to shame his supporters, and perpetuate the problem. Shaming people has never once in the history of mankind made people change their perspective, but that doesn’t stop us. This is because we like the problem. We like being right, and Trump and his supporters make it deliciously easy to be completely, undeniably right. Right?

When lost in Facebook Rightness, we are not sincerely interested in solutions, we are interested in winning.

SELF LOATHING RIGHTNESS

This is a big one, largely because we can get really stuck here. I know I have. Self Loathing Rightness is what happens when we make our own fallibility the subject of judgmental thinking. In this condition, our desire to be right overwhelms our need for self care, and we begin to tear ourselves apart.

This can happen in many forms. Sometimes we attack humanity as a whole (“we’re destroying the planet” or “we are inherently violent and evil” or just “people suck”), sometimes we attack a social group that we ourselves are part of (see: the penultimate paragraph of the previous section), and sometimes - you could even say very often - we attack ourselves as individuals (“I’m worthless/fat/stupid/a fraud/a failure…”).

This is a real conundrum, especially for people with very active minds. Because, see, if our higher purpose is to be right all the time, we will be constantly on the lookout for things to judge. And it doesn’t matter if we ourselves are the target, we would rather be right than happy. Or maybe, we would rather be correct about reality than at peace with our place in it.

A great many of us have been through this. We look in a mirror and see something we don’t like. Immediately we start judging that thing. Then we stop and remember that we shouldn’t judge, that self love is important, and so we begin beating ourselves up for judging. Which, of course, is another form of judgment and self loathing, which we realize immediately. Then we’re judging for judging the judging, and we are stuck in a loop. Then we feel that the very fact that we are stuck in a loop means something must be broken in us. How could we be so selfish? We’re so self obsessed, that’s pitiful. There are people suffering all over the world and here we are worrying endlessly about superficial things like appearance and social status and caloric intake and all the while the climate is changing and species are failing and refugees are homeless. Can’t we see the bigger picture? We must have some kind of design flaw, stuck in this selfish loop, navel gazing. We must be a failed version of a person. And on and on and on… 

What’s important here is not that the thought process is painful - it is - but that it has a motive. It wants to figure things out. It wants to be right about itself, even if that means self hatred. When the higher purpose of the self is to be right, it will sacrifice everything else on that altar. It’s also important to notice that very rarely does this thought process actually lead to anything like personal change or development, it just makes us feel like shit. (And then we feel like shit for feeling like shit and oh no here we go again…)

SPIRITUAL/PHILOSOPHICAL RIGHTNESS

There is in all of us, whether hidden or on the surface, an intense desire to have our chosen path be right. We want to have found “the thing,” and the temptation to believe that we have done so is powerful. We see this in Yoga, Mindfulness, Televangelical Christianity, New Age Spirituality, Corporate Buddhism, Scientism, Democratic Socialists, and all kinds of other systems of thinking that assure us they’ve got things figured out. And when we join a group with a common purpose, like a yoga studio or a church, there is often an initial rush of satisfaction or elation. We feel we have really figured life out and will never again be in danger of wrongness. But the rush fades in time. It always does. Then the world becomes unpredictable and chaotic again.

And this is OK.

It’s essential that we acknowledge that our systems of thinking are not final answers. The are not, in the end, right. They are methods living, not life's solutions. As the Zen masters would say, ‘don’t mistake the finger pointing at the moon for the moon.’ In the spiritual path the pursuit of rightness manifests as the desire to be done, to be complete, to have it figured out. And this desire simply gets in the way of the deep work of discovery.***

Those of us who choose to live on a spiritual or philosophical path must be honest with ourselves. Unyielding humility, sincerity, and honesty have the power to deeply alter our consciousness and bring harmony to our lives. But too often we use great ideas and spiritual traditions to reinforce our pre-existing patterns. We make ourselves right because of our diets or our physical practices, our bodies or our clothes. Or, a step further, we make ourselves right by being those enlightened ones who rise above corporatism and vanity and say things like “yoga is not about looking good” or “mindfulness has nothing to do with Whole Foods.”

It is essential that we ask ourselves, “am I doing this to be right?” If we are, then we’re missing the point and exacerbating the problem at hand; namely, that in this culture we prize rightness above peace, harmony, happiness, generosity, compassion, understanding, and all other virtues.

MAKING A CHOICE

The first verse of the Dao De Jing is “The Dao that can be named is not the true Dao.” This is usually understood to mean that words cannot ever fully describe reality. I say it goes further; there is no way to be right about reality. Systems, be they spiritual, logical, scientific, philosophical, whatever, will take you only so far. Eventually they all disintegrate because reality is not a system, or at least not one that we can comprehend. Rules only apply so far. Eventually, we have to acknowledge their and our limitations.

But this does not mean we can surrender to nihilism. We must participate in the shaping our experience, or it will be shaped for us. There is no stopping the mental process of judgment. We must choose something as our higher purpose to ground our judgments, to give them meaning, or we will be sucked into our culture’s default mode of thinking. Then our higher purpose will be personal rightness, which manifests as greed, anger, and self loathing.

The value of spiritual systems is that they help inform our thinking, they give us practices and stories and themes and traditions that have proved effective to others. But in the end we must choose our own way. And when we choose, we accept that we may be labeled as wrong. We accept that there are powerful arguments and logical structures that can be presented against our higher purpose. We accept that we may one day feel compelled to revise our choices and find a new higher purpose. And we still make the choice.


NOTES

*It might, however, make you feel weird or strange or bad sometimes. Personally, I see this is as sign that I might want to investigate my higher purpose and see about redefining it.

**What is the whole body-image industry based on if not “right beauty”? What are the thousands of diet fads if not “right food”? What is religion if not “right belief”?

***In the yoga community this can be especially tricky because there are many of us out here who are trying to make a living as teachers. It’s very difficult to persuade the modern American consumer to practice by saying, ‘hey, I don’t have the answer, but this is an effective method, though I can’t really tell you where the method is going because there is no "arriving" per se, so I’ve not arrived myself, and in the end you’ll never really 'get’ anywhere, or at least you don’t want to think about it like that… but you should totally come try it out.’ That’s just bad marketing. Good marketing involves convincing people you’re right. But, see, most yoga teachers value authenticity and humanity, so “good” marketing can feel really icky to those of us who have been humbled by the spiritual path… so we say things like “it’s not the destination, it’s the journey” which is of course true, but oversimplified and cliche to the point of near meaninglessness… needless to say, this whole process can turn into a loop of it’s own.